Search Beyond News…

Akeso initiates first patient enrollment in global Phase III trial comparing its PD-1/LAG-3 bispecific cadonilimab to nivolumab for first-line gastric cancer

Executive summary: Akeso announced that the first patient has been enrolled in the COMPASSION-37 trial, a global Phase III study comparing its PD-1/LAG-3 bispecific antibody cadonilimab with nivolumab as first-line therapy for gastric cancer. The trial could establish a new first-line immunotherapy option, validate Akeso’s bispecific antibody approach, and impact the market dynamics of gastric cancer treatments.

Who is involved: Akeso, Inc. (9926.HK) as sponsor; clinical sites worldwide; comparator nivolumab (bristol‑myers squibb).

Likely next (inference): Continued patient enrollment with an interim efficacy readout expected within the next 12‑18 months, followed by potential regulatory submissions if efficacy and safety targets are met.

Akeso dosed the first patient in COMPASSION-37, a multicenter Phase III study that will evaluate its investigational cadonilimab against the established PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in previously untreated gastric cancer. The trial represents a key milestone for Akeso’s bispecific antibody platform and could shape the competitive landscape of first-line gastric immunotherapy. Success would provide a new treatment option and potentially alter market shares, while failure could delay the company’s oncology pipeline.

What's next — scenarios

Inference: scenarios and probabilities are Beyond's assessment, not reported fact.

Base: Trial meets primary endpoint, leading to BLA filing (50%)

Akeso would file a biologics license application for cadonilimab in gastric cancer, opening a new revenue stream.

Upside: Strong superiority over nivolumab accelerates approval (30%)

Clear superiority could lead to accelerated approval and rapid market share gain in first‑line gastric cancer.

Downside: Trial fails to show superiority or safety concerns (20%)

Lack of efficacy or safety issues would delay development and potentially require trial redesign.

Timeline

Analysis — what this means

Sectors affected

Regulatory implications

Historical parallels

Key entities

Sources

Related cases

Browse the full archive →