Search Beyond News…

Australia explores building its first refinery in 60 years to reduce energy import dependence amid US-Iran tensions

Executive summary: Australia is studying the construction of its first oil refinery in six decades to counter the impact of the war between the US and Iran on its energy imports. The move reflects growing alarm over Australia’s reliance on imported energy — nearly 80% of supply — and seeks to mitigate risks from Middle East instability that could disrupt fuel flows.

Who is involved: Australian government and energy policymakers, with potential involvement from domestic and international energy firms; the US and Iran are key external actors influencing the context.

Likely next: Feasibility studies will proceed, potentially followed by stakeholder consultations and funding assessments, though no timeline for construction has been set.

Australia's exploration of building its first domestic oil refinery in six decades reflects a growing strategic reassessment of energy security amid persistent geopolitical volatility in the Middle East. With the country currently importing close to 80% of its refined fuel needs, disruptions stemming from US-Iran tensions — including intermittent military posturing and fluctuating oil output from Iran — have exposed the fragility of its supply chains. While the idea of a new refinery is not new, the current emphasis underscores a shift from viewing energy independence as a long-term aspiration to treating it as a near-term necessity for economic resilience. The move aligns with broader global trends where nations are re-evaluating reliance on distant suppliers, particularly as trade routes face increased risk of disruption. Establishing a domestic refinery would require substantial capital investment, likely spanning several years, and would depend on securing long-term crude supply agreements and navigating complex environmental and regulatory approvals. Critics may question the economic viability given Australia’s declining domestic oil production and the global trend toward decarbonization, but proponents argue that even a modest refining capacity could serve as a strategic buffer during crises. In the near term, the government is expected to commission feasibility studies and engage with potential private partners, though no formal commitments have been made. The outcome will hinge on balancing immediate security concerns with long-term energy transition goals.

What's next — scenarios

Strategic Buffer Implementation (30%)

Increased capital allocation toward domestic energy security infrastructure by private and public sectors.

Economic Viability Stagnation (50%)

Energy import dependence remains high, leaving fuel prices vulnerable to Middle East volatility.

Crisis-Driven Acceleration (20%)

Rapid deployment of modular refining technology to mitigate extreme supply chain disruptions.

What to watch

Timeline

Analysis — what this means

Likely next events

Sectors affected

Regulatory implications

Historical parallels

Key entities

Sources

Related cases

Browse the full archive →