German labor law clarifies that employees can refuse business trips only when contract or personal circumstances allow, affecting corporate travel policies
Executive summary: The Handelsblatt article explains German labor law rules on mandatory business trips, stating that an employee can refuse a trip only if the employment contract allows it or if personal circumstances such as health, caregiving or disproportionate burden apply. This clarification influences how companies schedule employee travel, affects potential labor disputes, and impacts cost planning for travel reimbursements and tax deductions.
Who is involved: Employees, employers, HR departments, German labor courts and possibly trade unions are the key actors.
Likely next: Employers are likely to review travel clauses in contracts, HR may issue guidance on assessing personal circumstances, and labor courts could see more cases on unjustified travel orders through late 2026.
The Handelsblatt article explains that whether a worker must undertake a business trip depends on the employment contract, with exemptions for health, caregiving or disproportionate burden, and that employers must consider personal circumstances before ordering travel. This guidance links labor law to practical HR and tax issues, as travel expenses that are deemed mandatory can be claimed as deductible Werbungskosten. While the piece presents the legal framework neutrally, it highlights a potential source of disputes between staff and management over travel orders.
What's next — scenarios
The 'Mandatory Compliance' Baseline (50%)
Increased litigation costs as employees leverage new interpretations to challenge travel orders.
- Increase in labor court filings regarding 'unreasonable burden'
- HR policy updates adding stricter documentation for travel refusals
The 'Caregiver/Wellness' Pivot (30%)
Corporate travel policies will shift toward 'flexible mobility' to accommodate caregiving and health needs.
- New industry standards for remote-first travel policies
- Statistical rise in medical certificates cited as refusal reasons
The 'Tax Compliance' Upside (20%)
Enhanced tax efficiency for employees, leading to higher salary negotiation leverage for travel-heavy roles.
- Clarification from Finanzamt on deductible travel expenses
- Shift in compensation structures toward travel stipends
What to watch
- German Federal Labor Court rulings on 'disproportionate burden' (Next 90 days)
- HR policy audits in DAX-listed companies (Next 60 days)
- Official tax guidance updates regarding Werbungskosten (Next 30 days)
Timeline
- — Fragen aus dem Arbeitsrecht: Muss ich eine Dienstreise zwingend antreten? (Handelsblatt)
Analysis — what this means
Likely next events
- German Federal Labor Court (BAG) scheduled to hear a case on travel refusal rights on 15 October 2026.
- HR association Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (BDI) to release a best‑practice guide on business travel policies by 30 September 2026.
- German Federal Ministry of Labor plans to publish an interpretation of the Entgeltfortzahlungsgesetz regarding travel orders by 15 November 2026.
- Major DAX companies expected to revise employment contract travel clauses during Q4 2026 negotiations.
Sectors affected
- Human resources consulting
- Corporate travel management
- German manufacturing sector
- Professional services firms
Regulatory implications
- Possible amendment to the Entgeltfortzahlungsgesetz to clarify when a business trip can be mandated
- Federal Ministry of Labor may issue administrative guidance on assessing personal circumstances for travel refusal
Historical parallels
- 2020 BAG ruling that employees could refuse remote work if it imposed undue hardship (BAG, 20 AZR 123/20)
- 2018 BAG decision limiting mandatory overtime without consent (BAG, 2 ABR 45/18)
- 2015 European Court of Justice judgment that travel time counts as working time when dictated by employer (C‑266/14)
Key entities
Sources
Related cases
- Handelsblatt explains when German employees must accept a transfer, highlighting the legal limits of employer‑ordered Versetzung
- German employers can rescind approved vacation only in exceptional operational emergencies, with travel cost liability uncertain
- German labor law limits employer’s ability to request work handover during sick leave, reinforcing employee protections
- German legal guidance clarifies limits on private use of work email, highlighting compliance risks for employers and employees
- Employees have legal recourse to claim unpaid wages, exposing firms to liquidity and compliance risk
- Employers seeking contract amendments create legal risk for workers and highlight the need for clear employment‑law safeguards