Search Beyond News…

Most countries failed to meet the 2025 deadline to identify subsidies that could harm biodiversity, with 84% of nations still lacking a full assessment

Executive summary: According to Carbon Brief, 84% of nations missed the 2025 deadline to identify all of their subsidies that could be harmful to biodiversity. Identifying nature‑harming subsidies is a prerequisite for reforming them; the widespread failure delays policy action needed to protect ecosystems and meet international biodiversity targets.

Who is involved: National governments worldwide, the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, and international bodies monitoring subsidy reform are the key actors.

Likely next: Countries are expected to submit updated subsidy inventories in upcoming reporting cycles, and international reviewers may increase scrutiny of national biodiversity strategies.

An analysis by Carbon Brief shows that 84% of countries did not complete the 2025 target to catalog all subsidies that may be damaging to biodiversity. The shortfall highlights a gap between international commitments made under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and national reporting capabilities. Without accurate identification, efforts to redirect or eliminate harmful subsidies remain hampered, potentially slowing progress on global biodiversity goals.

Timeline

Analysis — what this means

Sectors affected

Regulatory implications

Sources

Related cases

Browse the full archive →