Search Beyond News…

A 72‑year‑old couple keeps $900,000 in traditional IRAs unconverted, leaving their heirs a large ordinary‑income tax bill

Executive summary: A 72‑year‑old couple with $900,000 in traditional IRAs elected not to convert any amount to a Roth IRA, leaving the entire balance as a tax‑deferred account. Because non‑spouse heirs must withdraw the inherited IRA over ten years and pay ordinary income tax on each distribution, the children could face a substantial tax bill that shrinks the inheritance.

Who is involved: The unnamed 72‑year‑old couple, their adult children (beneficiaries), and the IRS rules governing inherited IRAs.

Likely next: The couple will need to begin required minimum distributions (RMDs) at age 73 (in 2027), increasing their taxable income, while the heirs will start taking distributions after the couple’s death.

The couple chose not to convert their traditional IRA assets to a Roth IRA, so the full balance remains subject to ordinary income tax when withdrawn. As non‑spouse beneficiaries, their children must take required distributions and pay tax at their marginal rates, which can substantially reduce the inheritance. The case illustrates the trade‑off between paying tax now via a Roth conversion and deferring tax to heirs, a decision that hinges on current versus expected future tax rates and life expectancy.

Timeline

Analysis — what this means

Sectors affected

Regulatory implications

Sources

Related cases

Browse the full archive →