German court strengthens sick‑note evidentiary value after termination, raising employer liability for continued wage payments
Executive summary: A German labour court decided that a medical certificate (Arbeitsunfähigkeitsbescheinigung) submitted after a dismissal remains valid proof of incapacity, and allegations of feigned illness do not automatically overturn the employer's obligation to pay continued wages. The ruling tightens the evidentiary burden on employers seeking to contest sick‑pay claims, potentially increasing labor‑cost exposure and influencing wage‑setting practices across sectors.
Who is involved: German labour courts, employers, employees (including aviation and start‑ups), trade unions, and legal advisors.
Likely next: Employers may review internal sick‑pay verification policies; unions could cite the precedent in wage negotiations; legislators might consider clarifying sick‑pay law to reduce uncertainty.
A German labour court ruled that a medical certificate submitted after a dismissal remains valid proof of incapacity, and claims of feigned illness do not automatically nullify the employer’s duty to pay continued wages. The decision shifts the evidentiary burden onto employers seeking to contest sick‑pay claims, potentially increasing labor‑cost exposure across industries. While welcomed by employees and unions as a protection against unfair dismissal‑related wage loss, it may prompt firms to tighten sick‑pay verification procedures and seek legislative clarification.
Timeline
- — Pilotengehalt: Das verdienen Lufthansa‑Piloten 2026 (Handelsblatt)
- — Interview: Top‑Investorin Luciana Lixandru: „Europa wird seinen Moment in der Sonne haben“ (Handelsblatt)
- — Arbeitsrecht: Krank nach Kündigung – Gericht stärkt Beweiswert des Attests (Handelsblatt)
Analysis — what this means
Likely next events
- Employers review sick‑pay verification procedures
Sectors affected
- Labor-intensive industries
- Aviation
- Start‑ups
- Public transport
Regulatory implications
- Higher evidentiary standard for contesting sick‑pay claims
- Increased compliance costs for HR departments
Historical parallels
- Similar to 2018 Federal Labour Court ruling on burden of proof for falsified sick notes
- Echoes of 2020 EU directive on sick‑pay transparency
- Analogous to 2022 UK case on employer challenges to medical certificates